It's not Twitter,Landlady’s Loose Legs it's you.
The social media company announced on Friday plans to more thoroughly explain why certain users don't meet its requirements for verification. It seems Twitter wants them to know why, in painfully specific detail, they failed in their quest for the elusive blue check.
"We've heard your feedback that we can be more clear on why an application didn't get approved," wrote the company. "Decision emails will now give more context on why requests don't meet our criteria."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
"[We] know that generic rejection emails were confusing and frustrating for folks," added Twitter product manager B Byrne, "so getting more specific information into the emails about verification decisions has been a top priority for our team."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Friday's announcement follows Twitter's recent move to open the verification process up to the public. The program had been paused since 2017 and only recently started back up this past May, although Twitter quietly continued verifying people during that time anyway.
Notably, not everyone has the option to apply for verification. As applications are, at least ostensibly, reviewed by real humans, Twitter has staggered the rollout to allow its team time to actually look them over.
Twitter addressed this fact as well on Friday, writing that everyone should have the option to apply soon. The company also noted that it intends to make the application itself more explicit.
SEE ALSO: You can now apply to get verified on Twitter. Here's how.
"To help you and clarify the info we accept for your [application] category, we'll be adding more guidelines within the application," Twitter explained. "Patience isn't part of the criteria, but we appreciate yours."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
We're sure Twitter's promise of clarity and transparency will make all future verification request rejections go down smoother.
Topics Social Media X/Twitter
Poets on Couches: Natalie Shapero by Natalie ShaperoHow to Survive the End of the World: An Interview with Mark O’Connell by Rosa LysterClassic Fiction with Binary Numbers by Tom GauldNobody’s Fault by Emerson WhitneyThe Art of Distance No. 7 by The Paris ReviewThe Art of Distance No. 7 by The Paris ReviewUnflinching Honesty: An Interview with Meredith Talusan by RL GoldbergSheltering in Place with Montaigne by Drew BratcherOur Motto by Maira KalmanThe Scientific Erotica Book Club by Tom GauldStill Life by Lynn Casteel HarperInside Story: What Spot? by Jenny BoullyI Want You by BlutchThe Great Bird Search by Nicolette PolekClassic Fiction with Binary Numbers by Tom GauldThe Black Gambling King of Chicago by Michael LaPointeOn Reading Basho with My TenThe Writer’s Obligation by Wayne KoestenbaumRedux: Suspension of Disparate Particles by The Paris ReviewPoets on Couches: Cynthia Cruz by Cynthia Cruz Musk's underground LA tunnel opening postponed DeepMind's AlphaZero is an AI neural The 10 best video games of 2018 Cows casually stroll through a woman's front yard in Scotland Glamorous teen applying flawless makeup is your new life coach 'Hotline Bling' mashed up with 'Hark the Herald Angels Sing' actually works The darkest fake media in 'Black Mirror': A complete guide Move over HODL, it's time to BUIDL MoviePass reinvents itself again for 2019 The internet loves this mundane Wyoming livestream for some reason OnePlus is making a 5G phone, but it won't be cheap Obama nominates first Muslim Rihanna fed the pigeons of New York City at 7 a.m. because why not? Amazon adds food delivery in London Microsoft's Chromium Kevin Hart issues statement about homophobic tweets Tony Stark is lost in space and NASA is here to help Looks like Léa Seydoux will return in the next James Bond movie This Instagram artist's mock self Pantone's 2019 color of the year isn't just a pretty pink
2.5581s , 10106.078125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Landlady’s Loose Legs】,Prosperous Times Information Network