A new coding technique could Kalakal (2025)make it possible to condense your entire digital library onto a microscopic hard drive.
Except the hard drive won't consist of metals and plastic. It will be made of DNA.
Scientists in New York have developed a way to compress digital files and squeeze the data into the four base nucleotides of DNA: A, G, C and T. They did so by adapting an algorithm designed for streaming videos on cell phones.
SEE ALSO: India's database with biometric details of its billion citizens ignites privacy debate"We take storage almost [for] granted, and we accumulate a lot of information in our daily life," said Yaniv Erlich, a computer science professor at Columbia University who co-authored a new study describing the technique.
"DNA is very compact," he said in a video interview. "It's one million times more compact than what you can get when you use a regular digital medium."
Genetic code has other major advantages over hard drives and CDs: DNA can potentially last for millennia, if stored in the right conditions. (Just ask scientists trying to revive the long-extinct woolly mammoth.) And DNA won't ever become outdated -- assuming we don't turn into cyborgs.
"If I try to hear Nirvana's Nevermind, my favorite CD twenty years ago, it's probably scratched and I cannot really listen to that," Erlich said. "But we can still retrieve DNA from skeletons that are thousands of years old. DNA will never be obsolete."
The research, published last week in the journal Science, is the latest in a growing number of studies to turn digital data into biological data.
Scientists are eyeing DNA because they already know it can store immense amounts of data in a minuscule space. Our genetic information -- everything that makes us who we are -- is stored within the microscopic chemical structure of DNA molecules. The idea with digital data is to take advantage of this dense, compact DNA structure and fill it with other types of information.
Researchers like George Church of Harvard University and Nick Goldman and Ewan Birney at the European Bioinformatics Institute have developed pioneering methods for converting ones and zeros into A's, G's, C's and T's.
Erlich and his co-author Dina Zielinksi, an associate scientist at the New York Genome Center, say they've found the best data-storing method yet. Their coding strategy could potentially pack 215 petabytes of data onto a single gram of DNA -- about 100 times more than methods published by Church, Goldman and Birney.
So how does it work?
To start, Erlich and Zielinksi selected 2 megabytes' worth of digital artifacts to write into the DNA, including a full computer operating system, an 1895 French film, a $50 Amazon gift card, a computer virus, and more.
They compressed those data files into one master file, then split the data into short strings of binary code made of ones and zeros. Next, they turned to an algorithm that -- in extreme layman's terms -- breaks up files and sends them as smaller chunks, called "droplets," to a storage device. (More formally, it's an erasure-correcting algorithm called fountain codes.)
The Columbia team randomly packaged their strings of binary code into these droplets. They then mapped the ones and zeros into the four nucleotide bases in DNA. The algorithm deleted any letter combinations known to create errors. It also added a barcode to each droplet, to help with reassembling the files later.
By the end, the scientists had generated a digital list of 72,000 DNA strands, each with 200 nucleotide bases. The duo sent these via text file to Twist Bioscience, a DNA-synthesis startup in San Francisco that specializes in transforming digital files into biological data.
Two weeks later, Erlich and Zielinksi received a vial holding a speck of DNA molecules.
Now their task was to transform those droplets into the original digital files. To do this, they used a modern sequencing technique to read the DNA strands. A software program translated the genetic code -- A, G, C, T -- back into ones and zeros.
Via GiphyThey recovered their files with zero errors, according to their Science study.
But don't ditch your hard drive just yet.
This belabored, highly technical technique is also extremely expensive. Erlich and Zielinksi said they spent $7,000 to synthesize the DNA they used to archive their 2 megabytes of data, plus another $2,000 to read it.
The costs of this technique aren't likely to fall precipitously anytime soon, given the limited demand for data synthesizing, Sri Kosuri, a biochemistry professor at the University of California Los Angeles, who was not involved in the study, said in a statement.
Apple TV+'s 'Wolfwalkers' has a whymiscal, stunning story worldYouTuber 'reviews' Samsung's upcoming Galaxy S21+ like it's no big deal'Jurassic World Aftermath' lets you play VR hide10 calming gifts for people with 2020 anxietyTwitter kills live video streaming app PeriscopeHow to share your screen on Google MeetHow cosmetic glitter improved my selfHow to see the Christmas star: The "Great Conjuction" is about to appearWhat horror movies will be like after 2020What Netflix's 2020 cancelations actually say about diversity in TV'Dreamers' flood Twitter with messages of hope as Trump decides their fateTwitter fined half a million dollars for late data breach reportingDon't laugh at this British politician — his views aren't funny, they're dangerous10 books I loved this yearSpatial’s new AR meeting app might save you from the Zoom grid of doomTaylor Swift drops a banger remix of 'willow': ListenDonald Trump probably isn't going to like what Putin just said about himTrump says Ivanka calls him 'daddy,' and he likes itMan attempts to hide from TV camera, fails spectacularlyJohn Legend once tried to break up with Chrissy Teigen, but she shut him down For millions in the Southeast, Matthew will be their first hurricane New tests question the purity of Apple's sapphire used in its iPhone cameras Hurricane Matthew forces UMG to cancel Orlando 'Call of Duty' tournament Mike Pence acts like he’s never met Donald Trump during VP debate Joel Embiid finally played some NBA basketball and it was awesome Disney takes on AI image generator Midjourney in scathing suit Marriage equality haters made a 'data Educate yourself on the clown The Pence vs. Kaine VP debate didn't get many viewers Dinosaurs roar in fourth clip from 'LEGO Jurassic World' short (Exclusive) Lightseekers turns action figures into game controllers Nicholas Hoult to play Nikola Tesla in Benedict Cumberbatch movie 'The Current War' Clinton ad shows Pence denying Trump claims as Trump says them Twitter users enlighten Pence on the true meaning of #ThatMexicanThing When Kim Kardashian returns to social media, it will be very different Proposal to force UK firms to list foreign workers causes controversy Smoking Samsung Galaxy Note7 replacement forced a plane evacuation Why watch Pence vs. Kaine? Because this is the real presidential debate. Total nerd Drake visited Drake University and hung outside sororities Trump live tweeted the vice presidential debate, because it didn't contain enough of him
2.6619s , 10134.03125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Kalakal (2025)】,Prosperous Times Information Network