We've had a year for conspiracy theories.
From the meme that spawned an alien-themed music festival just outside of Area 51 to suspicion surrounding Epstein's death,History Archives conspiracy theories have been at the forefront of internet culture. On Thursday, the hellish post-debate news cycle gave us Smooth Bernie.
Democratic candidates took to the debate stage for a fifth face-off on Wednesday night. Post-debate polling shows Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders both tied at the top, Emerson Polling reports.
But the real takeaway, according to conservative website The Washington Free Beacon, is that the Vermont senator looked "suspiciously smooth" during the debate. A Free Beacon article published Wednesday night questions whether Sanders went under the knife to get rid of his forehead wrinkles, pointing to a Getty photo taken during the debate that shows the 78-year-old with an unusually smooth brow.
The article also includes this intense side-by-side photo cutout of Sanders' forehead.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The photo in question shows the senator mid-sentence during the debate. A spokesperson for Getty Images noted that the photo was taken during the Oct. 15 debate in Westerville, Ohio, not the one that took place on Wednesday in Atlanta, Georgia.
"Plainly, no this image was not edited. We adhere to strict editorial guidelines and are committed to editorial principles, practices and process," the spokesperson continued.
Sanders appears significantly less smooth in other photos taken during the debate, which were taken by various photographers.
There are a number of factors to take into consideration before jumping on the Smooth Bernie tinfoil hat train. For one, wearing makeup during televised debates has been a standard practice dating back to the historic debate between Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy. While Kennedy appeared youthful and vibrant on camera, Nixon's poorly matched shade of drugstore makeup infamously melted under the hot lighting, making him appear "strange and sweaty," Vox wrote in 2016.
Sanders may have been prepped with some sturdy primer, light foundation, and sent to the stage with a spritz of setting spray. We live in the age of beauty gurus — who says a presidential candidate can't appreciate some BB cream?
Lighting also plays a part in how subjects appear on camera — bright, harsh lighting will highlight the grooves of someone's forehead. Lighting diffused through gels will soften features and be more forgiving.
Some lenses are more gentle than others for portraits, photography site Fstoppers explains. Particularly sharp lenses will highlight skin texture, but a wider aperture — how much light the lens lets in — can soften and blur out imperfections.
When The Young Turks reporter Ken Klippenstein tweeted about the bizarre theory that Sanders received pre-debate Botox, other Twitter users responded with horrifying versions of Even Smoother Bernie.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Twitter users also drew comparisons between Smooth Bernie and Smooth Yoda, who is just as unsettlingly smooth.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Sanders' campaign didn't respond to requests for comment regarding the senator's alleged wrinkle-loss.
UPDATE: Nov. 22, 2019, 9:54 a.m. PST A Getty Images spokesperson responded with this statement: "Plainly, no this image was not edited. We adhere to strict editorial guidelines and are committed to editorial principles, practices and process." They also noted that the photo in question is from the Oct. 15 debate, not the one that took place Wednesday.
Norrie vs. Djokovic 2025 livestream: Watch French Open for freeListen to the eerie sounds of Mars recorded by a NASA roverBest Sony deal: Save $41.99 on the Sony WFFire safety concerns spark new battery rules on flightsBest Samsung deal: Take $250 off the price of the Samsung Galaxy S25+ at AmazonNYT Connections hints and answers for May 30: Tips to solve 'Connections' #719.Gemini now autogenerates summaries for long Gmail threadsThermacell mosquito repellents are 42% off at AmazonM3 iPad Air on sale for an excellent priceThe 4 best AI image generators of 2025Get 15% off at Biird: Shop the Summer Sale now!Wes Anderson Archive: PreSave $90 on the Sonos Era 300 smart speakers at Amazon in May 2025NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for June 1: Tips to solve Connections #251Pacers vs. Knicks 2025 livestream: Watch Game 6 of NBA playoffs for freeMy first orgasm: In order to get off, I had to log offTwitch updates: Vertical video and dual streamingAmazon Echo Buds: $85 off at AmazonNYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for June 1: Tips to solve Connections #251Best earbuds deal: Save $65 on the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro Yeats and Pound: Great Poets, Terrible Gift Leonard Baskin’s Etchings for “Titus Andronicus” Kafka Feared Sex Because of Venereal Disease, His Biographer Says The Sad Saga of the Chopped Cheese Sandwich Excerpts from Donald Judd’s Writings, Selected by His Son, Flavin “Sound of the Axe,” a Poem by Denise Levertov From the Archive: Writers to Put Their Finger on What Inspires Them Poem: “At a Motel Near O’Hare Airport,” by Jane Kenyon The Electric Kool Nine Paintings by Nicholas Krushenick Oh, No, It’s Thousands of Jerry Maguire Videos… At Least We Still Have Isabelle Huppert How Do We Measure Vagueness (Or, When a Heap Is Not a Heap) The Eye of Baudelaire (And His “Forest of Symbols”) Wei Tchou Takes to the Streets for NYC’s Trump Protests A Comics Adaptation of Sigizmund Krzhizhanovsky The Changing Meaning of “Self Cover Story: Mario Carreño and Concrete Cuba From the Archive: Who’s This “Borges” Guy, Anyway? The Delightful Mysteries of ‘The Voynich Manuscript’
2.8626s , 10139.15625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【History Archives】,Prosperous Times Information Network